Archive for ◊ April, 2010 ◊

Author: admin
• Friday, April 30th, 2010

/a> is coming up quickly next week and I will be presenting about an hour of essential search engine optimization tips and insight specifically for B2B web sites along with Vocus Product Manager of PRWeb, /a>.

There’s a tremendous opportunity for B2B marketers to leverage SEO to increase prospect acquisition and to facilitate after the sale support and upgrades.  Most B2B marketers create a substantial amount of content to guide prospects through sales cycles that are much longer than companies selling consumer products/services.

While much of that content is published online, most of it isn’t optimized for search and digital assets are often ignored as potential traffic drivers via search.  In this session, we’ll focus on core SEO to help make a website’s content search engine friendly and talk about best and worst /a> for processes to optimize content for better search results. The PRWeb case study will show how they worked to refine their content management system overall so it would be technically search engine friendly. Other topics include: large website issues, duplicate content and what to consider when planning a website redesign.

Specific topics we’ll be discussing include:

B2B Content Optimization Strategy & Core SEO

  • Optimized Content Strategy
  • Core SEO (Keywords, Content, Technical & Links)
  • B2B SEO Best & Worst Practices Examples

Large B2B Website and Publisher SEO

  • Challenges you may run into if you have a large website
  • Duplicate content issues
  • Planning a redesign of your existing website (Migration Plan)

PRWeb as a Case study

  • PRWeb experience with SEO during site design, CMS updates
  • Technical SEO tips, sitemaps, site architecture

Focus on B2B SEO Best Practices

  • Best Practices Content SEO for B2B
  • Best Practices with Content Management Systems
  • Best Practices B2B SEO Measurement & Analytics

Then we’ll wind things up with about 1/2 hour of Q and A. If you’re a B2B marketer with a small or enterprise level web site, this is a must attend session and definitely an /a>. We hope you can make it.


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com

/a> is coming up quickly next week and I will be presenting about an hour of essential search engine optimization tips and insight specifically for B2B web sites along with Vocus Product Manager of PRWeb, /a>.

There’s a tremendous opportunity for B2B marketers to leverage SEO to increase prospect acquisition and to facilitate after the sale support and upgrades.  Most B2B marketers create a substantial amount of content to guide prospects through sales cycles that are much longer than companies selling consumer products/services.

While much of that content is published online, most of it isn’t optimized for search and digital assets are often ignored as potential traffic drivers via search.  In this session, we’ll focus on core SEO to help make a website’s content search engine friendly and talk about best and worst /a> for processes to optimize content for better search results. The PRWeb case study will show how they worked to refine their content management system overall so it would be technically search engine friendly. Other topics include: large website issues, duplicate content and what to consider when planning a website redesign.

Specific topics we’ll be discussing include:

B2B Content Optimization Strategy & Core SEO

  • Optimized Content Strategy
  • Core SEO (Keywords, Content, Technical & Links)
  • B2B SEO Best & Worst Practices Examples

Large B2B Website and Publisher SEO

  • Challenges you may run into if you have a large website
  • Duplicate content issues
  • Planning a redesign of your existing website (Migration Plan)

PRWeb as a Case study

  • PRWeb experience with SEO during site design, CMS updates
  • Technical SEO tips, sitemaps, site architecture

Focus on B2B SEO Best Practices

  • Best Practices Content SEO for B2B
  • Best Practices with Content Management Systems
  • Best Practices B2B SEO Measurement & Analytics

Then we’ll wind things up with about 1/2 hour of Q and A. If you’re a B2B marketer with a small or enterprise level web site, this is a must attend session and definitely an /a>. We hope you can make it.


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com


Follow this link:
/a>

Author: admin
• Friday, April 30th, 2010

img class=”alignnone size-full wp-image-1021″ title=”DesignM.ag-homepage” src=”http://seo2.0.onreact.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/DesignM.ag-homepage.png” alt=”" width=”500″ height=”255″ />

Steven Snell is a professional blogger who also runs a design business. He is the man behind /a>, /a> and /a>. Especially his two flagship design blogs have been very succesful in the past both by the sheer numbers as well as financially.

A few days ago he /a> one of his design blogs, DesignM.ag. I asked Steven a few questions about the blog, the sale, his overall business and blogging of course. The interview was conducted by email.

Tad Chef of SEO 2.0: Hello Steven, congratulations on your recent blog sale. You sold Designm.ag for 50k US $. Are you satisfied with the outcome of the auction?

Steven Snell of Designm.ag: Thanks Tad. First, for clarification, the winning bidder on Flippa actually wasn’t able to buy the site for personal reasons, but I was able to find another buyer at almost exactly the same price. I have mixed feelings about the outcome of the auction. I don’t have experience buying or selling established sites, so when I was planning to sell I reached out to some friends that I know are pretty active in that field. The feedback I got was that it could sell for a good bit more than what it did, but of course it all just depends on finding the right buyer. So honestly,

I wasn’t that excited about the price, but I’m confident that it was the fair market value

because I had about 4 people who were seriously interested and all were right around the same price. I’m really excited to be able to move on and have some time in my schedule now to be able to do some different things, but it will be weird not to be working on DesignM.ag anymore.

Tad Chef: You own/ed and lead/led at least 3 flagship blogs Designm.ag, the Vandelay Design Blog and Traffikd. Did I miss one? How did you choose which blog to sell?

Steven Snell: I have a few gallery sites, but yes, those are my three blogs. The decision to sell DesignM.ag was made because it took a significant portion of my time to manage on a continual basis and because I thought it had some value and would be of interest to buyers.

Tad Chef: It took you two years to sell Designm.ag – How long does it take for a blog to make sense financially in your opinion? Are 6 months of daily work enough?

Steven Snell: I think the amount of time it would take depends on the type of blog. For small niche blogs that are mostly set up to make money with AdSense or affiliate products you could probably sell at any point, assuming your able to make money with it. For the first year of DesignM.ag’s existence it really wasn’t monetized very aggressively,

my focus was on establishing a reputation and sustainable traffic.

A few months ago once those things had been accomplished I started to pursue some new monetization methods to increase the value of the site. For a blog that takes a similar approach (I guess you could call it an “authority blog”), it seems to me that you would want to wait at least a year before selling. I’m sure you could sell it earlier, but the early days of establishing a blog like this take a lot of work and usually generate only small amounts of income. So if you sell early I don’t think you’ll be maximizing what you can get for it.

Tad Chef: Of course not all blogs succeed inspite of the time (and money) invested. What were the most important factors for your business blogging success? Can you name them?

Steven Snell: I think one of the keys to DesignM.ag’s growth over the past two years was consistency. There were no gaps of more than a couple of days without new content and I was always working on new posts and new ideas.

I approached the site as a business and was willing to invest time without making much money in the early months.

The other big factor is the community aspect. When I launched the site I wanted it to be more than just a blog. The community news section has always been of interest to a lot of people, especially other design bloggers that are looking for some exposure. At the time I launched the site I thought that feature would be somewhat unique (CSS Globe and Noupe had news sections at that time) but in the past two years countless design blogs have added news sections, so it’s really not unique at all.

Tad Chef: Traffikd seems to be for some reason the least popular of your blogs. Why is that the case? Or is it just the obvious numbers and it earns much money behind the scenes?

Steven Snell: Traffikd is definitely the least popular, I think for a few reasons. First, it gets almost no attention. When I launched Traffikd I had been blogging actively at Vandelay Design for about six months and I’d learned a lot about blogging and social media. I was very active with social media at that point and I wanted to have a place to share some of the things I was learning.

Over time I’ve become less active with social media and now my efforts for promoting my blogs is just to focus on content.

So that leaves me with less ideas to write about and less interest in the topics covered at Traffikd. I removed ads from the site a while ago so that I won’t have the need to publish new content at any particular frequency.

Tad Chef: Working on so many high quality blogs wasn’t the only thing you do, you also have a design business and client work. How do you manage to do all of this? 80h work week? Employees?

Steven Snell: My client work is pretty limited right now, that may change after selling DesignM.ag. I have a few clients that I manage on an on-going basis and I take new projects when there is a really good fit. I have been working really long hours for 2 or 3 years (not really sure about numbers of hours) but I’m hoping to cut back a little bit and get a better work/life balance. I have no employees and outsource very little. At this point I don’t really have any desire to manage employees or deal with all that comes with it.

Tad Chef: Do you still have time to read other blogs and participate in social media beyond blogs? If yes, what bogs do you read, where are you most active on social media?

Steven Snell: I check a lot of blogs in my feed reader and on Twitter, but I mostly scan and wouldn’t say that I spend a lot of time reading blogs. I stay up-to-date with other design blogs so I know what is going on in the industry, but I don’t do as much reading as I would like. My activity with social media is also very limited. I get a lot of requests for votes on various sites, I post links on Twitter, and sometimes I submit my own posts to niche social media sites. A few years ago I used to spend much more time on social media sites, but now my voting is usually done from the blogs/sites I’m visiting, such as clicking on a Digg button or a Tweetmeme button.

Tad Chef: You are one of those bloggers who use lists/listicles extensively. It seems to have worked for you. On the other hand I notice that the Web is full f lists nobody can digest anymore. Are the days of successful lists over? What are the alternatives?

Steven Snell: You hear a lot of people say that they don’t like lists, but if you have a good list that really is helpful you will get overwhelmingly positive comments. There are so many design blogs now, and most of them publish lists. It’s definitely a challenge to keep the content original, but in my opinion there is still a place for lists.

There’s a big difference between a list for the sake of having a list and a list that is well-researched and helpful to readers.

One of the reasons I’ve used more lists on Vandelay Design in the past year is because of the time that I was spending on DesignM.ag. Now that I’ll have more time available I plan to diversify the posts a little more, although lists and inspiration posts will not be going away.

Tad Chef: I’ve noticed that you focus on /a> with your design agency. Are you a religious person? If yes, does being religious help you with being determined to succeed in the sense of the protestant work ethic? If not, why churches, accidentally or did you seek out a special niche like that?

Steven Snell: Yes, I am a Christian. I chose to focus on churches because it was an area of interest for me, and because there is a large market for church websites. I’m sure that my faith impacts my work ethic, I think it impacts all aspects of my life. Also, I’m a pretty competitive and stubborn person, so if I want to accomplish something I’ll usually keep working at it even after failures and setbacks.

I’m certainly not the most talented person in the world, but I do work hard and I’m commited to being successful with my business,

and I hope to be able to do it in a way that pleases God.

Tad Chef: Do you have something to add, something you want the SEO 2.0 readers to know?

Steven Snell: I had a few people ask me if it was my plan all along to sell DesignM.ag. The answer to that is no, I planned to keep it for the foreseeable future and make it a major part of my business. However, in recent months I really wanted to make some changes in my daily work (managing two active design blogs can lead to burnout!) and also wanted to free up some time for other things. I did start DesignM.ag with the intent of making money, but honestly I thought I would sell my other sites before selling DesignM.ag. I chose not to sell Vandelay Design because it’s really more of a business, whereas DesignM.ag is just a blog.

Steven started his blogging career around the same time I’ve started SEO 2.0 so I was able to watch him closely. We’ve been on he same social sites as well for a while. While I have focused on blogging for clients Steven has followed the path of independent flagship blogs. I think say it wasn’t a bad move. What do you think?

  • Was it worth it?
  • Did he sell below market value?
  • Is this a success story others can repeat?

Add your thoughts in the comment section below.

img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=yIl2AUoC8zA” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:D7DqB2pKExk” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=I9og5sOYxJI” border=”0″>

img class=”alignnone size-full wp-image-1021″ title=”DesignM.ag-homepage” src=”http://seo2.0.onreact.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/DesignM.ag-homepage.png” alt=”" width=”500″ height=”255″ />

Steven Snell is a professional blogger who also runs a design business. He is the man behind /a>, /a> and /a>. Especially his two flagship design blogs have been very succesful in the past both by the sheer numbers as well as financially.

A few days ago he /a> one of his design blogs, DesignM.ag. I asked Steven a few questions about the blog, the sale, his overall business and blogging of course. The interview was conducted by email.

Tad Chef of SEO 2.0: Hello Steven, congratulations on your recent blog sale. You sold Designm.ag for 50k US $. Are you satisfied with the outcome of the auction?

Steven Snell of Designm.ag: Thanks Tad. First, for clarification, the winning bidder on Flippa actually wasn’t able to buy the site for personal reasons, but I was able to find another buyer at almost exactly the same price. I have mixed feelings about the outcome of the auction. I don’t have experience buying or selling established sites, so when I was planning to sell I reached out to some friends that I know are pretty active in that field. The feedback I got was that it could sell for a good bit more than what it did, but of course it all just depends on finding the right buyer. So honestly,

I wasn’t that excited about the price, but I’m confident that it was the fair market value

because I had about 4 people who were seriously interested and all were right around the same price. I’m really excited to be able to move on and have some time in my schedule now to be able to do some different things, but it will be weird not to be working on DesignM.ag anymore.

Tad Chef: You own/ed and lead/led at least 3 flagship blogs Designm.ag, the Vandelay Design Blog and Traffikd. Did I miss one? How did you choose which blog to sell?

Steven Snell: I have a few gallery sites, but yes, those are my three blogs. The decision to sell DesignM.ag was made because it took a significant portion of my time to manage on a continual basis and because I thought it had some value and would be of interest to buyers.

Tad Chef: It took you two years to sell Designm.ag – How long does it take for a blog to make sense financially in your opinion? Are 6 months of daily work enough?

Steven Snell: I think the amount of time it would take depends on the type of blog. For small niche blogs that are mostly set up to make money with AdSense or affiliate products you could probably sell at any point, assuming your able to make money with it. For the first year of DesignM.ag’s existence it really wasn’t monetized very aggressively,

my focus was on establishing a reputation and sustainable traffic.

A few months ago once those things had been accomplished I started to pursue some new monetization methods to increase the value of the site. For a blog that takes a similar approach (I guess you could call it an “authority blog”), it seems to me that you would want to wait at least a year before selling. I’m sure you could sell it earlier, but the early days of establishing a blog like this take a lot of work and usually generate only small amounts of income. So if you sell early I don’t think you’ll be maximizing what you can get for it.

Tad Chef: Of course not all blogs succeed inspite of the time (and money) invested. What were the most important factors for your business blogging success? Can you name them?

Steven Snell: I think one of the keys to DesignM.ag’s growth over the past two years was consistency. There were no gaps of more than a couple of days without new content and I was always working on new posts and new ideas.

I approached the site as a business and was willing to invest time without making much money in the early months.

The other big factor is the community aspect. When I launched the site I wanted it to be more than just a blog. The community news section has always been of interest to a lot of people, especially other design bloggers that are looking for some exposure. At the time I launched the site I thought that feature would be somewhat unique (CSS Globe and Noupe had news sections at that time) but in the past two years countless design blogs have added news sections, so it’s really not unique at all.

Tad Chef: Traffikd seems to be for some reason the least popular of your blogs. Why is that the case? Or is it just the obvious numbers and it earns much money behind the scenes?

Steven Snell: Traffikd is definitely the least popular, I think for a few reasons. First, it gets almost no attention. When I launched Traffikd I had been blogging actively at Vandelay Design for about six months and I’d learned a lot about blogging and social media. I was very active with social media at that point and I wanted to have a place to share some of the things I was learning.

Over time I’ve become less active with social media and now my efforts for promoting my blogs is just to focus on content.

So that leaves me with less ideas to write about and less interest in the topics covered at Traffikd. I removed ads from the site a while ago so that I won’t have the need to publish new content at any particular frequency.

Tad Chef: Working on so many high quality blogs wasn’t the only thing you do, you also have a design business and client work. How do you manage to do all of this? 80h work week? Employees?

Steven Snell: My client work is pretty limited right now, that may change after selling DesignM.ag. I have a few clients that I manage on an on-going basis and I take new projects when there is a really good fit. I have been working really long hours for 2 or 3 years (not really sure about numbers of hours) but I’m hoping to cut back a little bit and get a better work/life balance. I have no employees and outsource very little. At this point I don’t really have any desire to manage employees or deal with all that comes with it.

Tad Chef: Do you still have time to read other blogs and participate in social media beyond blogs? If yes, what bogs do you read, where are you most active on social media?

Steven Snell: I check a lot of blogs in my feed reader and on Twitter, but I mostly scan and wouldn’t say that I spend a lot of time reading blogs. I stay up-to-date with other design blogs so I know what is going on in the industry, but I don’t do as much reading as I would like. My activity with social media is also very limited. I get a lot of requests for votes on various sites, I post links on Twitter, and sometimes I submit my own posts to niche social media sites. A few years ago I used to spend much more time on social media sites, but now my voting is usually done from the blogs/sites I’m visiting, such as clicking on a Digg button or a Tweetmeme button.

Tad Chef: You are one of those bloggers who use lists/listicles extensively. It seems to have worked for you. On the other hand I notice that the Web is full f lists nobody can digest anymore. Are the days of successful lists over? What are the alternatives?

Steven Snell: You hear a lot of people say that they don’t like lists, but if you have a good list that really is helpful you will get overwhelmingly positive comments. There are so many design blogs now, and most of them publish lists. It’s definitely a challenge to keep the content original, but in my opinion there is still a place for lists.

There’s a big difference between a list for the sake of having a list and a list that is well-researched and helpful to readers.

One of the reasons I’ve used more lists on Vandelay Design in the past year is because of the time that I was spending on DesignM.ag. Now that I’ll have more time available I plan to diversify the posts a little more, although lists and inspiration posts will not be going away.

Tad Chef: I’ve noticed that you focus on /a> with your design agency. Are you a religious person? If yes, does being religious help you with being determined to succeed in the sense of the protestant work ethic? If not, why churches, accidentally or did you seek out a special niche like that?

Steven Snell: Yes, I am a Christian. I chose to focus on churches because it was an area of interest for me, and because there is a large market for church websites. I’m sure that my faith impacts my work ethic, I think it impacts all aspects of my life. Also, I’m a pretty competitive and stubborn person, so if I want to accomplish something I’ll usually keep working at it even after failures and setbacks.

I’m certainly not the most talented person in the world, but I do work hard and I’m commited to being successful with my business,

and I hope to be able to do it in a way that pleases God.

Tad Chef: Do you have something to add, something you want the SEO 2.0 readers to know?

Steven Snell: I had a few people ask me if it was my plan all along to sell DesignM.ag. The answer to that is no, I planned to keep it for the foreseeable future and make it a major part of my business. However, in recent months I really wanted to make some changes in my daily work (managing two active design blogs can lead to burnout!) and also wanted to free up some time for other things. I did start DesignM.ag with the intent of making money, but honestly I thought I would sell my other sites before selling DesignM.ag. I chose not to sell Vandelay Design because it’s really more of a business, whereas DesignM.ag is just a blog.

Steven started his blogging career around the same time I’ve started SEO 2.0 so I was able to watch him closely. We’ve been on he same social sites as well for a while. While I have focused on blogging for clients Steven has followed the path of independent flagship blogs. I think say it wasn’t a bad move. What do you think?

  • Was it worth it?
  • Did he sell below market value?
  • Is this a success story others can repeat?

Add your thoughts in the comment section below.

img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=yIl2AUoC8zA” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=xF4Uch8tA5g:heme_QpV_kQ:D7DqB2pKExk” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=I9og5sOYxJI” border=”0″>


Read the original:
/a>

Author: admin
• Thursday, April 29th, 2010

img class=”alignleft size-full wp-image-9849″ style=”border: 5px solid white;” title=”strategy” src=”http://www.toprankblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/strategy1.jpg” alt=”" width=”304″ height=”215″ />With more businesses realizing the power of digital channels to nurture relationships, rally fans and build customer affinity, opportunity abounds for /a>.

But with execution /a> how should those who are new get started?

To answer that question, we posted thoughts from a variety of marketing and web professionals on /a>.

It’s an ongoing debate, but the consensus among the marketing and PR crowd is clear:  strategy before tactics is the logical approach for businesses to take when engaging in social media.

/a> provides a clever analogy:

Would you pick up a phone and randomly dial 10-digits? Unless you’re prank calling, probably not. The phone is a tool for communication, just like social media is a tool. Before making a phone call, sending a tweet or launching a blog, strategy is essential. It will guide the decisions you make, the platforms you use and how you interact.

Yet, in social media marketing and PR, it’s common for communications professionals to dive immediately into tactics without strategy “randomly dialing numbers” as Sarah notes above.

How often have you been in a meeting and heard things like “we need to /a>, let’s get on Twitter, or why don’t we start blogging?”  In the social web, it’s analogous to inviting people to a theme party and not telling them what the theme is (or even knowing yourself).  If you approach social media in this way, expect your returns to be as predictable as the costumes your guests at the party will wear.

/a> notes:

You really need to know why you want to use social media and which tools are best suited to meeting that objective. A good start is to know where, on social media, your customers hang out and what you can give them by joining their activities. This depends on which objectives you have in mind. It can be sales, lead generation, support, feedback, new ideas. So many things can be achieved in social media. If you know what your goals are they will shape the tactic.

Indeed.  While “getting more Twitter followers” may seem like a great idea, what if your market isn’t congregating on Twitter?  What if they are still using forums and boards (as many do)?  What if they are all bloggers who barely touch Twitter?  By jumping immediately into tactics without any thought, you may have success – but you may not.  It’s just not a methodical approach.

/a> adds:

Strategy needs to drive tactics, as companies first need to know where they’re going before they figure out how to get there. A lot of roads can get a brand from point A to B, but a good strategy will help selection of the optimal route, as well as how to respond if setbacks are encountered along the way.

This makes sense, as with any type of marketing – digital or otherwise – it is the strategy all tactics should roll to.  Without a solid strategy in place aimed at positioning you as the stand out in the market, it’s difficult to brainstorm and map out cohesive tactics that provide the best route to success.  In other words:  you might get lucky once in awhile if creating tactics without strategy, but you will not build up the momentum required to accelerate ahead of competitors.

All the strategy talk aside, tactics matter too.  And /a> understands this intimately:

“Social-media strategy” is over-rated if not a downright oxymoron. The goal is to do more business. Social-media is a means to that end. Maybe you’ll use it to establish warm and fuzzy communal feelings. Maybe you’ll sell excess inventory. Don’t focus on some kind of high-level strategy because no one really knows how to use social media yet. Focus on tactics: Get more followers, make them happy, promote your stuff to them every once in a while. That’s all you need to know about strategy right now.

Guy has a point:  a solid strategy does not decrease the value of experimenting, tinkering and trying new tactics out.  Yet in a sense, Guy is offering his own strategic approach to social media – the /a>.

At /a>, we believe that trial-and-error under the umbrella of a strategy is extremely valuable for businesses new to social media.  This is actually where they will learn the most, get real-time feedback and ultimately become fluent in /a>.  The strategy simply provides a framework for both planned and improvisational tactics, which can be dynamic.  In fact, a strategy itself could be designed in such a way to be fluid and shift with the times if a business is agile enough to change directions quickly.

/a> provides a succinct summation to the discussion:

In practical terms, you want to know where you’re going so you can get there. Every resource you expend in business needs to be justified. Everything worth doing needs to be measured. Social media is no different. It may be a great way to share useful content in places where your customers spend time to generate interest for further actions. And it can provide powerful business intelligence back, straight from the people who buy your products and services.

However, to capitalize on all of that, your process needs to tie all your activities together — the information sharing, the intelligence gathering, the communications, content creation, and anything else that happens in between. All activities aligned with and in support of the business. Without a strategy and goals, you won’t know how you’re going to measure results and won’t be able to answer the “so what” question.

Valeria’s statement is heavily grounded in reality.  To get buy-in from key decision makers and stakeholders, you need to be able to present a strategic plan outlining the tangible steps you’ll follow for success.  In the current economic climate (and really all of them) everything worth doing needs to be measured, and spends need to be justified.  The strategic plan allows you to confidently answer the all important “so what” question marketers inevitably receive from the C-suite.

Be sure and /a> as well as /a> on Twitter – we’ll be offering a PDF with even more from industry thought leaders on strategy vs. tactics in social media next week.


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com

img class=”alignleft size-full wp-image-9849″ style=”border: 5px solid white;” title=”strategy” src=”http://www.toprankblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/strategy1.jpg” alt=”" width=”304″ height=”215″ />With more businesses realizing the power of digital channels to nurture relationships, rally fans and build customer affinity, opportunity abounds for /a>.

But with execution /a> how should those who are new get started?

To answer that question, we posted thoughts from a variety of marketing and web professionals on /a>.

It’s an ongoing debate, but the consensus among the marketing and PR crowd is clear:  strategy before tactics is the logical approach for businesses to take when engaging in social media.

/a> provides a clever analogy:

Would you pick up a phone and randomly dial 10-digits? Unless you’re prank calling, probably not. The phone is a tool for communication, just like social media is a tool. Before making a phone call, sending a tweet or launching a blog, strategy is essential. It will guide the decisions you make, the platforms you use and how you interact.

Yet, in social media marketing and PR, it’s common for communications professionals to dive immediately into tactics without strategy “randomly dialing numbers” as Sarah notes above.

How often have you been in a meeting and heard things like “we need to /a>, let’s get on Twitter, or why don’t we start blogging?”  In the social web, it’s analogous to inviting people to a theme party and not telling them what the theme is (or even knowing yourself).  If you approach social media in this way, expect your returns to be as predictable as the costumes your guests at the party will wear.

/a> notes:

You really need to know why you want to use social media and which tools are best suited to meeting that objective. A good start is to know where, on social media, your customers hang out and what you can give them by joining their activities. This depends on which objectives you have in mind. It can be sales, lead generation, support, feedback, new ideas. So many things can be achieved in social media. If you know what your goals are they will shape the tactic.

Indeed.  While “getting more Twitter followers” may seem like a great idea, what if your market isn’t congregating on Twitter?  What if they are still using forums and boards (as many do)?  What if they are all bloggers who barely touch Twitter?  By jumping immediately into tactics without any thought, you may have success – but you may not.  It’s just not a methodical approach.

/a> adds:

Strategy needs to drive tactics, as companies first need to know where they’re going before they figure out how to get there. A lot of roads can get a brand from point A to B, but a good strategy will help selection of the optimal route, as well as how to respond if setbacks are encountered along the way.

This makes sense, as with any type of marketing – digital or otherwise – it is the strategy all tactics should roll to.  Without a solid strategy in place aimed at positioning you as the stand out in the market, it’s difficult to brainstorm and map out cohesive tactics that provide the best route to success.  In other words:  you might get lucky once in awhile if creating tactics without strategy, but you will not build up the momentum required to accelerate ahead of competitors.

All the strategy talk aside, tactics matter too.  And /a> understands this intimately:

“Social-media strategy” is over-rated if not a downright oxymoron. The goal is to do more business. Social-media is a means to that end. Maybe you’ll use it to establish warm and fuzzy communal feelings. Maybe you’ll sell excess inventory. Don’t focus on some kind of high-level strategy because no one really knows how to use social media yet. Focus on tactics: Get more followers, make them happy, promote your stuff to them every once in a while. That’s all you need to know about strategy right now.

Guy has a point:  a solid strategy does not decrease the value of experimenting, tinkering and trying new tactics out.  Yet in a sense, Guy is offering his own strategic approach to social media – the /a>.

At /a>, we believe that trial-and-error under the umbrella of a strategy is extremely valuable for businesses new to social media.  This is actually where they will learn the most, get real-time feedback and ultimately become fluent in /a>.  The strategy simply provides a framework for both planned and improvisational tactics, which can be dynamic.  In fact, a strategy itself could be designed in such a way to be fluid and shift with the times if a business is agile enough to change directions quickly.

/a> provides a succinct summation to the discussion:

In practical terms, you want to know where you’re going so you can get there. Every resource you expend in business needs to be justified. Everything worth doing needs to be measured. Social media is no different. It may be a great way to share useful content in places where your customers spend time to generate interest for further actions. And it can provide powerful business intelligence back, straight from the people who buy your products and services.

However, to capitalize on all of that, your process needs to tie all your activities together — the information sharing, the intelligence gathering, the communications, content creation, and anything else that happens in between. All activities aligned with and in support of the business. Without a strategy and goals, you won’t know how you’re going to measure results and won’t be able to answer the “so what” question.

Valeria’s statement is heavily grounded in reality.  To get buy-in from key decision makers and stakeholders, you need to be able to present a strategic plan outlining the tangible steps you’ll follow for success.  In the current economic climate (and really all of them) everything worth doing needs to be measured, and spends need to be justified.  The strategic plan allows you to confidently answer the all important “so what” question marketers inevitably receive from the C-suite.

Be sure and /a> as well as /a> on Twitter – we’ll be offering a PDF with even more from industry thought leaders on strategy vs. tactics in social media next week.


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com


See the original post:
/a>

Author: admin
• Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Several years ago (2007) I was asked to give a presentation at Jill Whalen’s High Rankings /a>. This was pretty cool because I had been reading Jill’s newsletter for years beforehand. The topic I spoke on was “UnGoogle Your Search Marketing,” where I discussed how to employ blogs, social media and optimized press releases as alternative, yet complimentary sources of web site traffic.

While search is the primary source of web traffic for our sites at TopRank Online Marketing and certainly for our client web sites, I think that now, more than ever, it’s important to “UnGoogle” your search marketing. Before anyone thinks I’m talking about ignoring Google completely, I suggest reading on.

Focusing content creation efforts solely to serve Search Engine Optimization purposes can be limiting. If the the only purpose for creating content is for search engine visibility, the publishing web site may improve search traffic but disappoint when it comes to converting that traffic. SEO alone might not be enough.

Every web designer and copywriter’s nightmare when it comes to SEO is an unattractive, keyword stuffed web page that might do well in search ranking but scares the hello out of anyone who visits. That’s an extreme of course, but my point is that great SEO leverages keyword use and search friendly design recommendations to the benefit of site visitors first or at least as much for people as for SEO. The best content optimization is a great expression of left/right brain thinking.

An alternative to such textbook SEO tactics would be to create connections and distribution channels that have nothing to do with search engines. Create sources of web traffic that are independent of search engines  but are executed in a search friendly way.

Fundamentally, that means: Listen to the social web. Learn about customer interests, preferences and needs. Create content to meet those needs. Grow networks in the /a> where those customers spend time AND in channels that influence them.  Investigate popular and relevant search based keywords as well as social keywords and incorporate them into the content strategy and social networking effort.

Use a combination of real time search and /a> to detect on-demand marketing opportunities and analyze the ebb and flow of keyword focused conversation. As advertising and media placements drive search queries, so do social conversations. While many of those opportunities are fleeting and not practical, some will take hold in the form of a conversation that turns to buzz and search.

In the end, creating content of value and connections with a network that focuses on delivering value to the customers and influencers you’re trying to reach will reap rewards beyond what SEO by itself can achieve. Invest in customer relationships, networks and an/a> program and you’ll achieve a distinct competitive advantage on the social web at large AND on Google.

photo credit: /a>


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com

Several years ago (2007) I was asked to give a presentation at Jill Whalen’s High Rankings /a>. This was pretty cool because I had been reading Jill’s newsletter for years beforehand. The topic I spoke on was “UnGoogle Your Search Marketing,” where I discussed how to employ blogs, social media and optimized press releases as alternative, yet complimentary sources of web site traffic.

While search is the primary source of web traffic for our sites at TopRank Online Marketing and certainly for our client web sites, I think that now, more than ever, it’s important to “UnGoogle” your search marketing. Before anyone thinks I’m talking about ignoring Google completely, I suggest reading on.

Focusing content creation efforts solely to serve Search Engine Optimization purposes can be limiting. If the the only purpose for creating content is for search engine visibility, the publishing web site may improve search traffic but disappoint when it comes to converting that traffic. SEO alone might not be enough.

Every web designer and copywriter’s nightmare when it comes to SEO is an unattractive, keyword stuffed web page that might do well in search ranking but scares the hello out of anyone who visits. That’s an extreme of course, but my point is that great SEO leverages keyword use and search friendly design recommendations to the benefit of site visitors first or at least as much for people as for SEO. The best content optimization is a great expression of left/right brain thinking.

An alternative to such textbook SEO tactics would be to create connections and distribution channels that have nothing to do with search engines. Create sources of web traffic that are independent of search engines  but are executed in a search friendly way.

Fundamentally, that means: Listen to the social web. Learn about customer interests, preferences and needs. Create content to meet those needs. Grow networks in the /a> where those customers spend time AND in channels that influence them.  Investigate popular and relevant search based keywords as well as social keywords and incorporate them into the content strategy and social networking effort.

Use a combination of real time search and /a> to detect on-demand marketing opportunities and analyze the ebb and flow of keyword focused conversation. As advertising and media placements drive search queries, so do social conversations. While many of those opportunities are fleeting and not practical, some will take hold in the form of a conversation that turns to buzz and search.

In the end, creating content of value and connections with a network that focuses on delivering value to the customers and influencers you’re trying to reach will reap rewards beyond what SEO by itself can achieve. Invest in customer relationships, networks and an/a> program and you’ll achieve a distinct competitive advantage on the social web at large AND on Google.

photo credit: /a>


© /a>, 2010. |
/a> |
/a> | http://www.toprankblog.com


Follow this link:
/a>

Author: admin
• Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Has a competitor launched a new feature that concerns you? If so, how do you react?

Google, well known for their public relations expertise, does not like the idea of Facebook creating an (eventual) distributed ad network based on demographics data. In spite of /a> (without asking), Google opting you into behavioral targeting (without asking), & /a> (without asking), suddenly they are a company /a> on *other* networks.

An effective attack typically should not look like it comes from corporate, but sound more like a list of alarmed concerns issued by /a>. And so we get /a>, a software engineer for the charitable arm of Google:

Facebook’s new system for connecting together the web seems to have a serious privacy hole, a web developer has discovered.

“It seemed that anyone could get this list. Today, I spent a while checking to make sure I wasn’t crazy,” he wrote on his blog. “I didn’t opt in for this. I even tried setting all my privacy settings for maximum privacy. But Facebook is still exposing the list of events I’ve attended, and maybe your event.”

The best thing to do is /a> and wait it out. It is easy to do, and you can always enable it later! :D

Read the original post:
/a>

Author: admin
• Monday, April 26th, 2010

img class=”alignnone size-full wp-image-1012″ title=”search-topsy-seo” src=”http://seo2.0.onreact.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/search-topsy-seo.png” alt=”" width=”575″ height=”290″ />

Refresh Monday is back. This time I revisit the 5 Twitter social news mashups that kick Digg’s ass as two of them were obsolete by now. Plus I have added a new one, a personalized Twitter social news service. So we have 6 of them.

Wisdom of crowds has proven very useful in organizing the information overflow of the Web. Sadly though the first wave of /a> to the point where some /a> for good while the second wave, /a> or /a> never reached a meaningful size.

There is a social site that has huge success currently though that has changed the face of social news, Twitter.

How that, isn’t Twitter just social networking and one to a few communications?

Well, yes, but that’s not the whole truth. Several sites have sprung up that analyze Twitter wisdom of crowds to organize and highlight the most important news and trends on the Web.

Some of these social news mashups, interfaces or tools have already disappeared again but a few of them grow while others, new ones appear. My favorite is the “Twitter newspaper” Twitter Times that collects links tweeted by your friends and their friends.

What are the 6 Twitter social news mashups that kick Digg’s ass?

strong>Twitter Times
The Twitter Tim.es is the best social news mashup I’ve seen so far. It not only finds the most popular stories or links it also personalizes them. You can view the stories linked by people a particular user follows. Just /a> to understand that. Also you can check out the most linked stories from renowned sources like the /a> or widely known groups of people from certain areas of expertise. I read my Twitter Times daily.

strong>Topsy
While TweetMeme is more popular by the numbers it seems Topsy is better at collecting Twitter links. It’s more a Twitter search engine but it has an excellent “/a>” section in several languages. The German one works perfectly. I use Topsy daily as well both as a Twitter search alternative and as a social news interface. You can search for the most popular links or tweets for a given query. The screen shot above shows the most tweeted SEO links last month.

strong>TweetMeme
TweetMeme is probably the most popular Twitter social news mashup but it’s not perfect. Sometimes it’s down. Some websites aren’t listed at all, this very blog, SEO 2.0, has been ignored for a while. The best thing about TweetMeme is the topical categorization of Twitter links.

/a>
This very Digg-like social news interface for Twitter was amazingly popular long before Tweetmeme and Topsy, it has been almost overwhelmed with its success and was later sold by the developer. It’s still works fine. It’s very easy to use and allows to get a quick overview on what’s going on at Twitter and thus also what’s hot on the Web right now. It also has a killer feature, the language filter, which shows you the most popular tweets in more than a dozen languages. Sadly these filters are not very accurate (e.g. German) or find many tweets (Persian, Russian).

/a>
This site is somewhat similar to Twitturly but it focuses more on the most recent tweets which also are popular, an interface that confuses me a little. It has an advantage though, it displays popular images and videos as well. Unlike other Twitter image search engines it seem to be safe for work.

/a>
While MicroBlogBuzz resembles both Twitturly and Twitturls it also shows an overview of two of the other Twitter-like microblogging sites namely Jaiku and Identica. Google has discontinued Jaiku but soon after the platform has been resurrected as an open source version. The best thing about this MicroBlogBuzz are the several time frame options. You can check out what’s popular in the last hour, today etc.

These sites are at the forefront of the Twitter social news trend. In contrast highly biased social news sites where marauding troll groups censor topics that don’t fit their world view lose ground.

Twitter is the number one place for social news by now.

You just have to know how to find the most popular news there. These tools are more than enough to achieve that.

Last updated April 26, 2010. Frst published: January 19, 2009.

img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=yIl2AUoC8zA” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:gIN9vFwOqvQ” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:F7zBnMyn0Lo” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:D7DqB2pKExk” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=I9og5sOYxJI” border=”0″>

img class=”alignnone size-full wp-image-1012″ title=”search-topsy-seo” src=”http://seo2.0.onreact.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/search-topsy-seo.png” alt=”" width=”575″ height=”290″ />

Refresh Monday is back. This time I revisit the 5 Twitter social news mashups that kick Digg’s ass as two of them were obsolete by now. Plus I have added a new one, a personalized Twitter social news service. So we have 6 of them.

Wisdom of crowds has proven very useful in organizing the information overflow of the Web. Sadly though the first wave of /a> to the point where some /a> for good while the second wave, /a> or /a> never reached a meaningful size.

There is a social site that has huge success currently though that has changed the face of social news, Twitter.

How that, isn’t Twitter just social networking and one to a few communications?

Well, yes, but that’s not the whole truth. Several sites have sprung up that analyze Twitter wisdom of crowds to organize and highlight the most important news and trends on the Web.

Some of these social news mashups, interfaces or tools have already disappeared again but a few of them grow while others, new ones appear. My favorite is the “Twitter newspaper” Twitter Times that collects links tweeted by your friends and their friends.

What are the 6 Twitter social news mashups that kick Digg’s ass?

strong>Twitter Times
The Twitter Tim.es is the best social news mashup I’ve seen so far. It not only finds the most popular stories or links it also personalizes them. You can view the stories linked by people a particular user follows. Just /a> to understand that. Also you can check out the most linked stories from renowned sources like the /a> or widely known groups of people from certain areas of expertise. I read my Twitter Times daily.

strong>Topsy
While TweetMeme is more popular by the numbers it seems Topsy is better at collecting Twitter links. It’s more a Twitter search engine but it has an excellent “/a>” section in several languages. The German one works perfectly. I use Topsy daily as well both as a Twitter search alternative and as a social news interface. You can search for the most popular links or tweets for a given query. The screen shot above shows the most tweeted SEO links last month.

strong>TweetMeme
TweetMeme is probably the most popular Twitter social news mashup but it’s not perfect. Sometimes it’s down. Some websites aren’t listed at all, this very blog, SEO 2.0, has been ignored for a while. The best thing about TweetMeme is the topical categorization of Twitter links.

/a>
This very Digg-like social news interface for Twitter was amazingly popular long before Tweetmeme and Topsy, it has been almost overwhelmed with its success and was later sold by the developer. It’s still works fine. It’s very easy to use and allows to get a quick overview on what’s going on at Twitter and thus also what’s hot on the Web right now. It also has a killer feature, the language filter, which shows you the most popular tweets in more than a dozen languages. Sadly these filters are not very accurate (e.g. German) or find many tweets (Persian, Russian).

/a>
This site is somewhat similar to Twitturly but it focuses more on the most recent tweets which also are popular, an interface that confuses me a little. It has an advantage though, it displays popular images and videos as well. Unlike other Twitter image search engines it seem to be safe for work.

/a>
While MicroBlogBuzz resembles both Twitturly and Twitturls it also shows an overview of two of the other Twitter-like microblogging sites namely Jaiku and Identica. Google has discontinued Jaiku but soon after the platform has been resurrected as an open source version. The best thing about this MicroBlogBuzz are the several time frame options. You can check out what’s popular in the last hour, today etc.

These sites are at the forefront of the Twitter social news trend. In contrast highly biased social news sites where marauding troll groups censor topics that don’t fit their world view lose ground.

Twitter is the number one place for social news by now.

You just have to know how to find the most popular news there. These tools are more than enough to achieve that.

Last updated April 26, 2010. Frst published: January 19, 2009.

img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=yIl2AUoC8zA” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:gIN9vFwOqvQ” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:F7zBnMyn0Lo” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?i=AMtJg2kisQU:HVz6Mpejem4:D7DqB2pKExk” border=”0″> img src=”http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/seo20?d=I9og5sOYxJI” border=”0″>


Follow this link:
/a>